Kerri Nigito, DVM, CPH, MPH, DABVP (Food Animal Practice)
Co-course Director
Assistant Professor, Department of Large Animal Medicine and Surgery
knigito1@sgu.edu
Office hours by appointment on Zoom or in person. Please email anytime with questions or concerns.
Amanda Marancik, DVM
Co-course Director
Assistant Professor, Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery
amaranci@sgu.edu
Office hours by appointment on Zoom or in person. Please email anytime with questions or concerns.
Other lecturers/faculty:
Dr. Austin Kirwan
Email: barnlodge@aol.com
Dr. Adria Rodriguez
Email: airodriguez@sgu.edu
Dr. Heather Douglas
Email: hdouglas@sgu.edu
Dr. Anne Corrigan
Email: acorrigan@sgu.edu
Dr. Heidi Janicke
Email: hjanicke@sgu.edu
Dr. Peter Slinger DES
Email: pslinger@sgu.edu
Dr. Paul Fields
Email: pfields@sgu.edu
Dr. Cheryl Cox- Macpherson
Email: ccox@sgu.edu
Administrative Staff:
Dr. Satesh Bidaisee
Email: sbidaisee@sgu.edu
Ms. Jaclyn Tuason
Email: Jtuason@sgu.edu
Dr. Lorraine Steele
Email: Lsteele@sgu.edu
Ms. Keshia John
Email: kjohn5@sgu.edu
In-person lecture hall for students in Grenada. Online via synchronous Zoom sessions and/ asynchronous Panopto recordings for students off island
Online Sakai Site and/or Top Hat for resources, recordings, and assignments.
A functional computer with microphone and camera.
None.
- Students who need accommodations should contact Student Accessibility and Accommodations Services (SAAS), located in the Welcome Center, inside the International Students Office.
- Information can be found at mycampus.sgu.edu/group/saas
None.
This course is the first of 6 courses within the Professional Development Curriculum focused on professional development. Through experiential learning methods including a 2-day workshop, students will be exposed to the concepts of non- technical attributes such as teamwork, communication, self and social awareness, and self-care that are vital to their success as a student and veterinarian. Specific coursework related to study skills, ethics, financial literacy and evidence-based medicine is included. This course provides the foundation for their time at SGU; developing a sense of community within their class as they grow together into young professionals.
- Upon completion of this course, students will be able to:
- Discuss the fundamentals of the six domains of professional development
- Recognize the professional attributes of a successful veterinarian including attitude, appearance, respect, responsibility, self-awareness and social awareness, tolerance, and self-management.
Lesson | Outcomes |
Domain 1: Professionalism lecture series and PAWS 2-day seminar |
|
Domain 2: Wellness lecture series and faculty mentor group meeting |
|
Domain 3: Ethics and Welfare lecture series |
|
Domain 5: Financial Literacy lecture series |
|
Domain 6: Evidence-Based Veterinary Medicine |
|
Course Level Outcome |
Program Level Outcome |
Discuss the fundamentals of the six domains of professional development |
B. Core Professional Attributes PLO 12 Demonstrate, evaluate, and model effective communication with clients, the general public, professional colleagues and responsible authorities. PLO 13 Demonstrate, evaluate, and model ethical and responsible behavior in relation to animal care and client relations, such as, honesty, respect, integrity and empathy PLO 14 Demonstrate, evaluate, and model leadership, teamwork and conflict resolution skills as a member of a multidisciplinary team. PLO 16 Demonstrate and model adaptability and resilience. PLO 17 Demonstrate and model self-awareness including understanding personal limitations and willingness to seek advice. PLO 19 Demonstrate appropriate sensitivity to client diversity, such as cultural, economic, and emotional differences. |
Recognize the professional attributes of a successful veterinarian including attitude, appearance, respect, responsibility, self-awareness and social awareness, tolerance, and self-management |
B. Core Professional Attributes PLO 12 Demonstrate, evaluate, and model effective communication with clients, the general public, professional colleagues and responsible authorities. PLO 13 Demonstrate, evaluate, and model ethical and responsible behavior in relation to animal care and client relations, such as, honesty, respect, integrity and empathy PLO 14 Demonstrate, evaluate, and model leadership, teamwork and conflict resolution skills as a member of a multidisciplinary team. PLO 16 Demonstrate and model adaptability and resilience. PLO 17 Demonstrate and model self-awareness including understanding personal limitations and willingness to seek advice. PLO 19 Demonstrate appropriate sensitivity to client diversity, such as cultural, economic, and emotional differences. |
Date / Hour |
Lecture topic |
Faculty |
Assignment |
Cr Hrs |
January 17 & 18
ALL DAY |
PAWS Workshop! |
PAWS Faculty and Facilitators |
|
8 |
January 19th 1.30-2.20p |
Personal Budgeting, Finance and Loans |
Dr. Heather Douglas |
**Mandatory** Budgeting Workshop Activities Workbook: Create a personal budget reflecting your current financial status and upload the entire workbook to Sakai (2 hour)
Opens January 19 and Due: February 6th by 11:55pm AST |
2 |
January 20th
1.30-2.20p |
Job Opportunities During Breaks |
Dr. Heather Douglas |
|
1 |
January 21th
1:30-2:20p |
Scholarships & Grants |
Dr. Heather Douglas |
|
1 |
January 26th
1.30-2.20p |
Study Skills |
Dr. Peter Slinger |
|
1 |
February 3rd
1.30-2.20p |
Wellness in Vet Med |
Dr. Adria Rodriguez |
|
1 |
February 3rd 2:30-3:20p |
Coping with Stress |
Ms. Jackie Tuason (DES) & Ms. Lorraine Steele (PSC) |
|
1 |
February 8th 8.30a-9.20a |
Your Veterinary Career |
Self- directed learning (no in class lecture) |
Review the provided resources and start to conduct externship searches using the links/resources in the weekly requirements tab |
1 |
February 15th 10.30-11.20p |
Professional Etiquette & Class Code of Conduct |
Dr. Kerri Nigito |
**Mandatory** In Class Activity (10 min): Class Code of Conduct: Working in groups develop a set of 3-5 guidelines to follow and post on your class Facebook page
Due: in Class |
1 |
February 21st and 22nd |
Your Veterinary Career |
Faculty Mentor Meeting |
**Mandatory** Externship Assignment Opens: Research 3 externship opportunities and discuss how they would be helpful for your veterinary career/education. Full instructions in ExamSoft Due: March 1st @ 11:55pm AST (upload to ExamSoft) Peer Review Due: March 20th @ 11:55pm AST in ExamSoft |
1 |
February 23rd
1.30-2.20p |
Intro to EBVM & Research at SGU |
Dr. Heidi Janicke |
|
1 |
March 3rd 1.30-2.20p |
Research Possibilities at SGU |
Dr. Cheetham- Brow & Dr. Bidaisee |
|
1 |
Midterm Exams |
|
|
||
March 15th – March 29th |
Wellness Self- Assessment |
Faculty Mentor Meeting |
Wellness Regimen Assignment: AFTER your scheduled mentor meeting, create a wellness regimen to address specific areas in your self-assessment. Due: One Week after your scheduled Mentor Session (Upload in ExamSoft) Full Instructions in ExamSoft |
2 |
March 16th
1.30-2.20p |
Approach to Second Half of the Term |
Dr. Peter Slinger |
|
1 |
March 17th
4.30-5.20 |
Introduction to Ethics Part 1 |
Dr. Austin Kirwan |
**Mandatory** In-Class Reflection Activity: (10 min) How do you now compare and contrast human rights and animal rights?
Due: March 25th by 11:55pm AST |
2 |
March 18th
4.30-5.20 |
Introduction to Ethics Part 2 |
|||
March 25th 2.30-3.20 |
Animals in Society & the Role of the Vet |
Dr. Austin Kirwan |
**Mandatory** In-Class Reflection Activity: (10 min) What problem(s) do you see with anthropomorphism when treating your patients?
Due: April 1st by 11:55pm AST |
1 |
March 28th 1.30-2.20p |
Research Methods |
Dr. Paul Fields |
**Mandatory** In-Class Reflection Activity (10 min): Qualitative and quantitative research questions
Due: in Class by April 4th 11:55pm AST (in Weekly Requirements) |
1 |
April 8th
1.30-2.20p |
Responsible Conduct of |
Dr. Cheryl Cox- Macpherson |
**Mandatory** Quiz Research and EBVM at SGU
Quiz in Sakai Tests & Quizzes |
1 |
|
Research in Veterinary Medicine |
|
Opens April 14th and Due: Sunday, April 24th, by 11:55pm AST |
|
April 14th 1.30-2.20p |
Scientific Inquiry Live via Zoom |
Dr. Paul Fields |
**Mandatory** In-Class Reflection Activity (10 min): Go through the steps of the inquiry process with one of your research questions
Due: April 21st 11:55pm AST (in Weekly requirements) |
1 |
April 21st
1.30-2.20p |
Wellness Check In – Focus on Support |
Dr. Adria Rodriguez |
|
1 |
Faculty mentor group meetings will be scheduled in the first and second halves of the term. You will be required to go to TWO of these sessions based on your faculty mentor availability. (See Faculty mentor Assignments Posted on Sakai)
The course will be graded Pass/Fail.
100- 69.5% = Pass
<69.5% = Fail
Evaluation |
Weighted |
Points |
Externship Peer Review Assignment |
10% |
28pts |
Wellness Regimen Assignment |
20% |
24pts |
Budgeting Workshop Activities Workbook |
5% |
P/F |
Class Code of Conduct |
5% |
P/F |
Ethics In-Class Reflection Questions (2) |
5% (2.5% Each) |
P/F |
EBVM Quiz |
10% |
10 pts |
EBVM In-Class Reflection Questions (2) |
5% (2.5% Each) |
P/F |
Professionalism Evaluation at Midterm |
20% |
20pts |
Professionalism Evaluation at Final |
20% |
20pts |
A grade of passing will be determined by:
- Successful completion of 2 assignments (see below)
- Mandatory attendance at the Faculty mentor meeting
- Mandatory engagement in the course content which includes:
- Attendance of all lecture sessions
- Review of all asynchronous recorded seminars
- Completion of “in-class” assignments, activities, and reflection questions.
- No unexcused absences are allowed. Any absences or technical difficulties must be immediately addressed by emailing one of the course directors (Dr. Kerri Nigito knigito1@sgu.edu or Dr. Amanda Marancik, amaranci@sgu.edu ). Failure to attend mandatory meetings, lectures, and/or engage in course content may result in course failure AND the student may be placed on non-academic probation by the CAPPS committee.
- See Rubrics in Appendix
Course Assignments:
- Externship Assignment Peer Review and Faculty Mentor Meeting: Identify three potential Summer Externship opportunities that would be beneficial for your career goals. For each opportunity, include a 1-2 paragraph summary that highlights the type of mentors you would like to work with and the specific experiences that you would like to gain. Briefly describe how this opportunity will advance your career. This is graded pass/fail based on a rubric encompassing the important components of the assignment (see Appendix A). This assignment will be covered in more detail during the faculty seminar and in the self-directed module titled: “Your Veterinary Career” on Monday, February 8th @ 8:30am AST. The Due Date for this assignment is Monday, March 1st @ 11:55pm
AST. Assignments must be uploaded as a single PDF document in My Courses (Sakai) before the due date expires. Peer Review is due by: March 20th @ 11:55pm in Sakai.
- Professional Development Mentor Group Meeting/Self Care Regimen Assignment: Students meet with their assigned group and faculty mentor to discuss wellbeing in our profession and how to develop a regimen for self-care/wellness. Students will then submit their proposed self-care regimen encompassing emotional, spiritual, social and physical aspects to their faculty mentor. The Due Date for this assignment will be one week after your assigned faculty mentor meeting. Please refer to Appendix B for grading rubric.
A passing grade is determined by attending the mandatory meeting and completing the assignment. If the group interaction or assignment quality is inadequate and indicates the need for faculty intervention or remediation, this will be discussed with the course director to find an appropriate solution. Failure to meet these minimum standards will require one-on- one remediation with the course director and/or the faculty mentor before being allowed to progress to Term 2. Remediation will be tailored to the deficiency and the individual.
COLUMNS (Performance Levels) Externship Assignment Mentor Evaluation |
||||
ROWS (Dimensions) |
Meets expectations consistently (4) |
Meets expectations most of the time (3) |
Occasionally meets expectations (2) |
Does not meet expectations (1) |
Student demonstrates a clear understanding of the externship concept |
Student clearly and concisely described 3 different externship opportunities including the type of experience, the specific area of specialty, and the format of the experience. |
Student generally clearly and concisely described 3 different externship opportunities and may have excluded no more than 1 of the following: the type of experience, the specific area of specialty, and the format of the experience. |
Student occasionally clearly and concisely described 3 different externship opportunities and/or excluded information on the type of experience, the specific area of specialty, and the format of the experience. |
The student did not clearly and concisely describe 3 different externship opportunities and/or excluded information on the type of experience, the specific area of specialty, and the format of the experience. |
Student demonstrates a clear understanding of the mentorship concept |
Consistently and clearly explained the type of mentorship available and/or the type of mentor that the student would like to gain for each externship experience |
Generally explained the type of mentorship available and/or the type of mentor that the student would like to gain for each externship experience with an occasional lack of clarity. |
Inconsistently explained the type of mentorship available and/or the type of mentor that the student would like to gain for each externship experience |
The student did not explain the type of mentorship available and/or the type of mentor that the student would like to gain for any externship experience |
Student discusses the relevance of externship content |
Consistently and clearly explained the relevance of each externship experience to personal professional development. |
Generally explained the relevance of each externship experience to personal professional development with an occasional lack of clarity at times. |
Inconsistently explained the relevance of each externship experience to personal professional development. |
The student failed to explain the relevance of each externship experience to personal professional development. |
Demonstrates appropriate writing and grammar skills |
Wrote an appropriate assignment using correct grammar and spelling with no mistakes. |
The assignment had 2 or fewer minor grammatical and/or spelling errors. |
The assignment had 3-4 major grammatical and/or spelling errors |
The assignment had more than 4 grammatical and/or spelling errors. |
Organization and Structure |
The assignment was very well organized and easy to follow with a natural flow. |
The assignment generally was organized, however there were times when it was difficult to follow the thought process or content. |
The assignment was generally disorganized making it difficult to follow the thought process and content |
There was no discernible organization or flow of the assignment and it was difficult to follow the writing and content. |
Appropriately adheres to word count guidelines |
Student submitted an assignment within the 400 word count maximum requirements |
Student submitted an assignment that was less than 450 words |
Student submitted an assignment that was less than 500 words |
Student submitted an assignment that was greater than 500 words |
Appropriately adheres to deadlines |
Assignment was submitted by the deadline and/or student communicated with course director PRIOR to deadline with any technical/medical/personal issues |
Assignment was submitted after the deadline and/or not submitted and student communicated with course director the same day of assignment submission with any technical/medical/personal issues |
Assignment was not submitted, and student communicated with course director more than 24 hours after assignment submission with any technical/medical/personal issues |
Assignment was not submitted, and student never communicated with course directo |
Appendix B:
Wellness Regimen Grading Rubric:
COLUMNS (Performance Levels) Wellness Regimen Assignment Mentor Evaluation |
||||
ROWS (Dimensions) |
Meets expectations consistently (4) |
Meets expectations most of the time (3) |
Occasionally meets expectations (2) |
Does not meet expectations (1) |
Student demonstrates a clear understanding of their Wellness Self- Evaluation |
Student clearly and concisely described the wellness areas from the self-evaluation that received low scores. |
Student generally clearly and concisely described the wellness areas from the self- evaluation that received low scores. |
Student occasionally clearly and concisely described the wellness areas from the self- evaluation that received low scores. |
The student did not clearly and concisely describe the wellness areas from the self-evaluation that received low scores. |
Student presents a clear schedule of events addressing specific wellness concerns from the self-evaluation |
Consistently and in a clear schedule format explained the type of activities/techniques student will utilize to address the wellness areas that received lower scores. |
Generally explained in an unclear schedule format the type of activities/techniques student will utilize to address the wellness areas that received lower scores. |
Inconsistently explained in an unclear schedule format the type of activities/techniques student will utilize to address the wellness areas that received lower scores. |
The student did not explain or use any type of schedule format the type of activities/techniques student will utilize to address the wellness areas that received lower scores |
Student discusses the relevance of each event to address each wellness concern |
Consistently and clearly explained the relevance of each activity/technique and how it will address the wellness areas that received lower scores. |
Generally explained, sometimes unclearly the relevance of each activity/technique and how it will address the wellness areas that received lower scores. |
Inconsistently explained the relevance of each activity/technique and how it will address the wellness areas that received lower scores. |
The student failed to explain the relevance of each activity/technique and how it will address the wellness areas that received lower scores. |
Student demonstrates appropriate writing and grammar skills |
Wrote an appropriate assignment using correct grammar and spelling with no mistakes. |
The assignment had 2 or fewer minor grammatical and/or spelling errors. |
The assignment had 3-4 major grammatical and/or spelling errors |
The assignment had more than 4 grammatical and/or spelling errors. |
Organization and Structure |
The assignment was very well organized and easy to follow with a natural flow. |
The assignment generally was organized, however there were times when it was difficult to follow |
The assignment was generally disorganized making it difficult to follow the thought process and content. |
There was no discernible organization or flow of the assignment and it was difficult to follow the writing and |
Appropriately adheres to deadlines |
Assignment was submitted by the deadline and/or student communicated with course director PRIOR to deadline with any technical/medical/personal issues |
Assignment was submitted after the deadline and/or not submitted and student communicated with course director the same day of assignment submission with any technical/medical/personal issues |
Assignment was not submitted, and student communicated with course director more than 24 hours after assignment submission with any technical/medical/personal issues |
Assignment was not submitted, and student never communicated with course director |
Appendix C:
Professionalism Grading Rubric:
Criteria |
Meets expectations consistently (4) |
Meets expectations most of the time (3) |
Occasionally meets expectations (2) |
Does not meet expectations (1) |
Punctuality |
Student is on time for all sessions and/or communicates with the course director within 2 hours of the session if more than 10 minutes late |
Student is more than 10 minutes late and communicates with course director on the same day as the session |
Student is more than 10 minutes late and communicate with course director but not on the same day as the session |
Student is not on time for sessions and does not communicate at any time with the course director |
Attendance |
Student attends or views all mandatory sessions for the entire duration of the session and/or communicates with the course director within 2 hours of the session |
Student misses/does not view 1 or more mandatory sessions and/or does not attend for the entire duration of the session (90%) and communicates with course director on the same day as the session |
Student misses/does not view 1 or more mandatory sessions and/or does not attend for the entire duration of the session (90%) and communicate with course director but not on the same day as the session |
Student misses/does not view 1 or more mandatory sessions and/or does not attend for the entire duration of the session (90%) and does not communicate at any time with the course director |
Engagement - Assignments |
Student completes assignments on time and/or communicates with the course director PRIOR to deadline with any technical/medical/personal issues. |
Student submitted assignment after the deadline and/or not submitted and student communicated with course director the same day of assignment deadline with any technical/medical/personal issues |
Assignment was not submitted, and student communicated with course director more than 24 hours after assignment deadline with any technical/medical/personal issues |
Student does not turn in assignments on time and did not communicate with the course director at any time. |
Engagement – Reflection/in- class activity |
Student completes reflection questions/in- class activities on time and/or communicates with the course director PRIOR to deadline with any technical/medical/personal issues. |
Student submitted reflection questions/in- class activity after the deadline and/or not submitted and student communicated with course director the same day of assignment deadline with any technical/medical/personal issues |
Reflection question/in- class activity was not submitted, and student communicated with course director more than 24 hours after assignment deadline with any technical/medical/personal issues |
Student does not complete reflection questions/in-class activity on time and did not communicate with the course director at any time. |
Communication |
Student always communicates in a professional tone and timely manner. |
Communication is mostly professional and timely with some minor areas of improvement needed. |
Communication is generally professional in tone, but often untimely and major improvement is needed. |
Student does not communicate in a professional tone and/or timely manner. |
Total (20 points) |
|
|
|
|
Remain engaged throughout the course to benefit from the various active learning activities.
- The student is expected to adhere to the guidelines provided throughout this syllabus including attendance and assignment submission.
- The student is expected to communicate with the Course director professionally and in a timely manner in the event of technical/medical/personal difficulties resulting in the inability to attend lectures or hand in assignments on time for any reason.
Please exhibit professional and respectful behavior at all times to colleagues, faculty and staff. Turn cell phones off or silence them during lectures. Please be on time and engaged in course content.
(refer student to the student manual page if applicable)
Students are expected to be available during the standard 8:30am- 5:20pm AST school day, to attend, engage with in-person/online content, and participate in all classes and clinical rotations for which they have registered. Employment is not an excusable absence.
Although attendance, engagement, and participation may not be recorded at every academic activity, attendance, engagement, and participation is graded for mandatory sessions. Students’ lack of attendance, engagement, and participation may adversely affect their academic status as specified in the grading policy.
If failure to attend, engage, or participate in individual classes, examinations, and online activities, or from the University itself is anticipated, or occurs spontaneously due to illness or other extenuating circumstances, proper notification procedures must be followed.
Attendance is mandatory for all Term 1 students during the PAWS Workshop, all professionalism lectures and the professional mentor group meetings. One unexcused absence may result in course failure and the student may be placed on non-academic probation by the CAPPS committee. Please review the “Professionalism” rubric in Appendix C.
Students are expected to be on time; arrival after the first 10 minutes or leaving before the end of class (less than 70% of the session) will count as an absence. Any student unable to adhere to the attendance policies of this course is mandated to complete the online "Medical Excuse Submission" form PRIOR to missing the required activity. Failure to complete the "Medical Excuse Submission" form will result in an unexcused absence. Please communicate with a Course Director (Dr. Kerri Nigito knigito1@sgu.edu or Dr. Amanda Marancik, amaranci@sgu.edu) immediately in the event of an unexpected absence due to extenuating circumstances.
Mandatory engagement and participation expectations:
- Mandatory attendance at the Faculty mentor meeting
- Mandatory engagement in the course content which includes:
- Attendance of all lecture seminar sessions
- Review of all mandatory asynchronous recorded seminars
- Completion of all assignments and activities.
Students who fail to attend an examination (Sakai quiz/test or Examsoft) or submit an assignment by the deadline without a valid reason (see student manual: SGUSVM POLICY ON AN EXCUSED ABSENCE (EA) FOR STUDENTS) will receive a score of “0” points for the examination.
Students who have technical issues during the examination MUST inform the Course Director (s) (Dr. Kerri Nigito, knigito1@sgu.edu or Dr. Amanda Marancik, amaranci@sgu.edu) and IT (tellexaminationservices@sgu.edu OR support@sgu.edu OR call 1- 631-665-8500 ext. 4444 (US, NU, International) OR 1-473-439-2000 ext. 4444 (Grenada), AND Dean of Students (DOS@sgu.edu) during the open period for the examination. Failure to do so immediately will result in the student receiving the highest score recorded at the time, but NOT being eligible to take a completion examination.
Scheduling of examinations (regular, re-sit, completion, comprehensive, or exemption) is at the discretion of the University. Completion exams will be scheduled within 7 days of the original exam date. Re-sit examination will be scheduled in the first week of the following term.
Failure to submit any assignment or submit an assignment late may result in course failure AND the student may be placed on non- academic probation by the CAPPS committee
All students are responsible for knowing and complying with the University’s Code of Conduct and the guidelines. Students must read and then sign the Honor Code statement at the start of examinations to indicate that they will comply with the University Code of Conduct.
The materials (such as slides, handouts and audio/video recordings) provided to students who are taking courses at St. George’s University (SGU) are the intellectual property of the Faculty and/or Administration of SGU. Students are free to use these materials solely for the purpose of group or individual study. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited.